|
Another interesting factor: the video itself has a frame rate of about 15 frames per second. This frame rate does not match with the normal 30 frames per second of NTSC video recording. It can be argued that every other frame was dropped in the posted video, because of storage space concerns. However, it seems unlikely that, in a peer review environment, quality would be compromised in such a way.
In my opinion, this adds to my theory that this whole video was computer engineered, as I proposed earlier.
J.Rocha, Lisbon, Portugal
I think this video is quite obviously a fake. The background seems to be a still image, panned and zoomed through software manipulation in order to make it seem like camera movement. Though the camera seems to be facing the sun, there is never any change in sun deflection or lens flare. The pixelization is obvious in the last few frames - and I saw the clear version.
The UFO itself seems somewhat more convincing, but its movement are always too mechanical and linear, and the shadow is not obvious.
Seems to me like a simple computer animation of a 3D model superimposed in a bitmap of the landscape.
Disclaimer: I'm not a mindless skeptic drone; I believe in the existence of UFO phenomena, although I've never seen one by myself.
J.Rocha, Lisbon, Portugal
Someone said this was on TV. What TV show was this on? I watch all kinds of documetarties and I've never seen this on TV or movies.
The guy who posted the previous reply to the TV comment
I agree with the last comment. Most things that LOOK too good to be true, usually are.
can't tell,as usual in this type of video,it is inconclusive.
This is the first time I've seen this footage. What TV show was it on? (To a previous posting who claimed to have seen this on TV)
To the person who posted before the last comment. I can't blame you for your opinion but you obviously didn't take the time to download the clear version of this video. The background does not become pixelated like you claim it does. Download it and see for yourself.
That UFO was a fake i saw it on TV
This video was obviously faked. It started off looking real enough on my first viewing, but after i watched it several times, i noticed several inconsistencies. First of all, notice how bright it is outside, however, the apparently metallic "craft" displays no reflection at all. This could be explained away by "alien materials," so i'll admit it's not a very strong argument. Second, notice that just before the "craft" flies over the truck, it moves up in direct conjunction with the camera, and then the picture jumps a little. Watch the video again and you'll see what i mean-it's an obvious use of a movie editing program to add the "saucer." Third, just before the "craft" disappears from view above the camera, notice that pixels appear as it gets larger, showing that it is a graphic.
i think that it look so real, because about 150 yard from truck and ufo is moving so fast to pass truck about 1 to 2 sec.wow over 1,500 mph !!
Dont know...Wish we could walk up and kick the tires.....E-Man
This is real! Notice how the UFO changes direction! It defies directional physical principles. It changes direction too fast to be a remote controlled object and there is a shadow in the beginning of the film showing that there is a real object.
I onece sall a ufo atmy house pleaseresponed
chris tanner
i think hat this is a total fake because...
Yes, this is very good footage indeed. I downloaded the "clear" version and it's much more telling than the footage displayed on this site. The clarity brings the footage to life.
It's either a very detailed remote controlled model, or it's "the real thing". The movements do seem to be much too agile for a remote controlled toy though.
The lack of a shadow trail might be explained by the object's angle of ascent in relationship to the angle of the sun. The shadow appears to correlate to the movement of the object in the first part of the video and then diminishes as the object rises up nearly directly toward the sun. This would explain why the shadow would remain in the same place and not leave a trail.
FAKE! The object casts no shadow as it passes overhead, nor it there any real smoothness of movement. I think what we have here is a model of the AREA S4 UFO from Testor's Incorporated and an elaborately built set using common hobby shop materials such as you would find in the model railroad section. (i.e. scale trees and shurbs.)
If anything, the footage is a great example of how easily most people can be fooled.
It looks as if he were trying to zoom in as the UFO started to fly overhead. I can see where an inexperienced cameraman could have trouble following the ship while adjusting the controls. The question shouls be: How experienced, or inexperienced is he with a camera.
From a subjective point of view it would seem that the cameraman was a little slow to follow the object as it moved overhead. From the footage seen it would appear that he should have been able to follow it a litte better then he did.
**************************************************
The Poll is up!
PLEASE VOTE ON THIS FOOTAGE.
Results will be posted on May 10th, 2002
Thank you for your participation,
MR Admin
**************************************************
Whatever... I disagree. There are many people who have an objective mind, who are not "afraid of their own shadow". Not every "open-mined" person is a "Trekie". and some are quite intelligent and contribute to your every day life.
We can only take the information that is given to us and decide for ourselves. We can all come to conclusions all day and not all of us will agree with everything we see. Every person sees something different.
To "What?", What I meant was ; to be in league with those who are so afraid of their own shadow, they will believe anything.
The footage of this UFO sighting is not clear enough to come to a conclusion either way.
Although I have examined the footage myself in detail, I do not believe this to be real. As you point out there is no shadow, although there does appear to be one at the beginning, it does not move. Upon closer examination, (my quality is diminished by the download) it appears to be a group of bushes. I can only conclude that this is a hoax, which makes the real sighting that much more dubious. All I can say to the "photographer" is "get a life" and quit playing with the Photoshop.
To the last comment... "What"?
To give this pitifull attempt of video trickery any consideration is to be in league with those who are afraid of their own shadow and claim "The sky is falling!"
**************************************************
THE DECISION WILL SOON BE YOURS!
We will be placing a poll on this page so you, the viewers, can decide once-and-for-all, if this video is “Fact or Fiction”.
The poll will be placed here on 4/08/02. Please vote and participate.
Thank you for your participation
MR Admin
**************************************************
There are so many things that can be done to video these days. I'm not sure if I can take this as "truth or fiction".
William
Does anyone remember the first time they saw a "flying saucer" ? How about the movies!!!
I was just wondering, who exactly runs this site? Between bandwidth and the page design there has been a considerable amount of money put into it for a site that doesnt seem like it has much money making potential... So what exactly are the owner's intentions? Just curious...
Justin
**************************************************
REMINDER!
This is not a forum for name-calling but for serious discussion and honest, civil criticism. The last comment was deleted.
Thank you for your cooperation.
MR Admin
*************************************************
I don't "whole heartedly" agree, but this explanation does seem to be reasonable. This just goes back to another comment made here. "Video evidense can not be considered credible proof of the existance of aliens". It's too easily tampered with.
You just hit the nail on the mother lovin head!!!
Looks like a fake. The color and shadow transitions of the object are far more consistant than the surrounding video. Also the object in the video seems to overcome the movement created by a hand held shot. It looks like the object was rendered in a still frame while the background images were captured with hand-held video. DIGITALLY INSERTED VIDEO.
looks a little fishy to me I thought it was a toy at first after taking a second it still looks like a toy to me.
I don't know anything about if the cameraman investigated the area or not but if you read the posting again, it sounds like he was in route to the hunting area. The spot where this footage was taken might not have been where he was going.
Did the hunter walk over to the area where the craft appeared to be hovering to check out the ground etc. Looks like an odd place to hunt deer!
I do not see the shift on the UFO that the last post spoke about? Where does this "shift" take place? I have played this in slow-motion, fast-motion, and have examined it as good as I could and I don't see it. I do see a camera shift at about a half a second before the UFO flys away. I know you said that "you were not sure" but I'm curious to see what you are talking about.
Thanks!
I'm not sure but I do notice a shift in the object prior to forward movement that could be some kind of edit displacement. I am not a skeptic when it comes to UFO's but until we have a ship land infront of 30,000 people at a football game and have a humanoid get out and say take Howdy!!! No video or still photo will be taken seriously.
I SECOND THAT AMEN! It looks like we are finally coming to a conclusion for this footage. This footage looks legitimate and it does display physical characteristics that make this video very believable. But, that fact still remains... Special effects are becoming increasingly easy to do (including people on home computers). So, there really isn't any video evidense that can be taken as "the real thing". This footage is nice, but doesn't hold any crucial proof as far as I'm concerned.
AMEN BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is my opinion that no matter how credible videos seem to be, they can not be taken as plausable proof for the UFO phenomenon. This is simply because videos are too easily faked. This looks pretty real to me but who knows what went into creating it, or if it is real footage?
Justin- Ive spent many years as a skeptic. Ive even posted here poking fun at people for believing in this phenomenon. After reading what you have posted here I think my stance has shifted a little.I respect you for your courage and insight. And in the future, I promise I will try to keep an open mind
Respectfuly, MIB
(I posted the "COME ON" comments)
This is in response to the person asking why we bother with videos like this that could be hoaxes when there are more important things to do. The UFO phenomenon is of extreme importance. There is abundant and credible evidence that suggests our government has recovered downed alien ships and is conducting research with alien technologies. These technologies include anti-gravitic propulsion and zero point energy(technolgy capable of tapping into the ambient energy in the space around us). These technologies would of great value, especially since we are facing an innevitable energy crisis and are also destroying our planet. Think it sounds ridiculous? I guarantee you will come home one day and turn on the tv to find congressional hearings being held on the very subject.
-Justin (I also wrote the post under the admin response.)
I think the person who psted their opinion (before the MR Admin reply) has a terrific point. There are too many people who dismiss evidense like this way too soon. Yes, I agree, this could be remote controlled but it is WAY too agile in the air for it to be. It changes direction and accellerates too fast for me to think that is what it is. I think this clip should be examined by people who are more specialized in dealing with stuff like this. Perhaps Art Bell could be made aware of this footage? I don't know who the higher authority would be but I think this needs to be looked into.
**************************************************
Answer to the last comment: "MAYBE THE ADMIN COULD REMOVE THE ADDRESS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE VIDEO, AND PUT IT ON THE LEFT SIDE? That'd be great, so we could see more of the ground."
We made sure that no details were blocked by the address and it doesn't cover any shadows. None are visible with, or without the watermark.
We thank you for your comments and suggestions.
MR Admin
**************************************************
First off, I think you skeptics who frequent these sights are hilarious. You just scream like scared children and dribble on about the obviousness of the hoax. Such intellectuals you guys; I'd love to see your SAT scores. Heres a suggestion: Stop wasting your energy, the sites forum space, and bandwidth. Thanks.
Of course it has to be considered that every video or picture could be a hoax, and thats why you have to study them and look for evidence that it is or isn't. But to declare something to absolutely be a hoax is just as dumb as declaring that it absolutely is real.
This footage has lots going for it. One, the close examination of pixels hasnt revealed an obvious hoax attempt. And there are lots of details to suggest the opposite. None of the people who have commented seem to dispute that. In fact, most of the nay sayers have screamed that its a remote control aircraft. Great! Most everyone agrees its an actual physical object.
In my opinion, it doesnt appear to be a remote controlled aircraft. The craft moves way too quickly and sharply for that to be the case. You could argue that he could have sped up the frame rate, but the camera movement seems to be what you would expect it to be when someone is holding a camera. Especially the upward movement. And to adjust your movement to compensate when you altered the frame rate just seems like way more effort than soemone would put into a hoax like this.
The scale seems ok to me. The camera work is shaky, like one would expect, but you can clearly see that the craft has a regular swinging motion when its stationary. The movement looks smooth and to me looks like it should. And that isnt based on me seeing other ufos, but just my understanding of our environment. You can usually tell when something doesnt look like it is obeying the environmental rules we are familiar with.
Why does it conveniently fly over his head? Well, since to suggest that it actually is a ufo implies that you think it is being operated by intelligent beings,isnt it be possible it was done intentionally, and not by the camera man or his buddy? How unlikely is it that they would decide to fly over the person they just discovered was watching them? If I was the one in the craft, Im sure thats just what I would do. Its called FUN.
I think that when we consider the existence of extraterrestrials we often overlook the fact that most likely the occupants of the 10 ufos we've seen dont represent the entirety of the et civilization. I think they could be researchers or whatever, from a civilization that has a large population, with a culture and that they have many of the emotions we do. I dont think they are just mindless robots.
I suppose this could be a cgi job, but I doubt it. I havent seen anybody try that yet. Sure, somebody could model the ship, tape the scene and slap the two together, but I think something would stand out that indicated that. I think the blinking lights thing is good evidence against it being cgi. Im pretty sure I never would have thought to add that, so the frames showed up differently, and Im pretty into this kinda stuff. Thats an impressive detail. Again, just way too much effort for a hoax.
Im not sure about any shadows being present or not. MAYBE THE ADMIN COULD REMOVE THE ADDRESS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE VIDEO, AND PUT IT ON THE LEFT SIDE? That'd be great, so we could see more of the ground. it does look overcast, and the tree is where you would see the shadow for the longest period of time if there was one. Another thing to consider is that a technology like this wouldnt necessarily cast a shadow. It could distort space/time/light around it or be slightly out of dimension...
I think the footage is damn good. Id say it has a good chance of being real. But I dont place any value on it as evidence anyway. Its pretty much worthless as evidence for the existence of et, but thats ok since there is much more important and credible evidence being looked at. Its great to see though, and musta been a kick for the guy who saw it. I wouldnt mind one of them buzzing over my house :P If it is a hoax and someone is having a good laugh, to them I say,"Awesome job man, beautiful work!"
Do you honestly think for one minute that this footage will change the world if its proved to be real or fake? COME ON! I think we have better things to do and more real things to worry about than college level video editing that some dumbass tried to pass off as real. Don't get me wrong, you all are entitled to your opinion and I for one respect all of you who had the courage to post your comments here, but dont you think for one minute that some one is trying to pull your leg and submitted this footage just to see what kind of reaction he or she would get out of us? Please comment on this and PLEASE do it with some intelligence.
Are there other web sites this video is posted on? Based on the last couple of postings, I'm confused? I haven't seen this footage on TV or heard about it on the radio yet? Please list other sources of info about this.
Ok Mr. "CONGRATULATIONS", who proved this to be a fake? According to the submission, this video isn't very old. How long ago was this proven to be faked? Who studied it? What are their credentials? Give your sources or you might as well not post a comment. Since you claim to have the evidence, now the burden of proof is on you. How was this a hoax?
CONGRADULATIONS Mr.I have been viewing videos for 11 years now" because this is @#$%@. This was provewn a fake a long time ago.
Cannot say whether video is fake or not. I am, however, very open minded about life forms on other planets. What makes us so special to think that we're the only people in the universe?
Hey the people that think this is bull *&&^%$ are nuts beleive me dip wads this might not be. I have been viewing videos for 11 years now and I know that this could be the real deal. The people that don't want to beleive won't because there little minds won't let them but for the ones that know that this could happen have at least an open mind to view something like this. Is it real? I would give it a 70% chance it is. It flys like others I have seen, and viewed. The shadow theory has a point, a craft that large should of put out something but at the same time when it went over he did not zoom out or in giving me the impression that he/she was not hiding anything. If anyone that follows this topic knows that these crafts go very very fast and not getting around in time to focus again is legitimate. Also if you zoom in and take a few moments to study this craft it does have some details. One, windows on top, interesting to me. Most hoaxs do not go into detail. Also the bottom has a raised edge. It vibrates like most others caught on tape also.
If you do not think it is real that is your opinion but give us all a break and give us reasons why, not just mouthing off like 5 year olds.
Mike
ps. to the person that made this what is the small building to the right bottom of the screen?
I think Mr. Admin Should find a way to block the narrow minded from posting here.
C'mon Give the guy a break, its not his fault hes so bored out of his mind he'll believe anything he sees. He'll probably buy my oceanfront desert property also!
Thats because your probably about 25 to 35 years old, overwieght, bald, and living with your parents. Im willing to bet your a "Trekkie" also.
Some people are not taking this footage seriously! While it might not be clear video, I think it needs to be investigated much further because it looks very telling to me.
I took the time to study the footage (as suggested) and I don't think it is completely unreliable. I also do not think it can be taken as PROOF though. The video is too computerized to tell if it is real or not. This can not be reliable evidense for UFOs but I will not say it is a fake either.
Thank you Jesus!!!! An educated person who took time to really look at this footage and can see plain as day, its total crap!
I think Jamin (a few comments below) has a good point. How many people, who are accusing this to be a hoax really sat and looked at the video. My guess is, not too many. Most debunkers know it's a fake, even before they see it. There is no real attempt to give it any legitimacy. It's a fake and nothing else. I challenge everyone to take the time to really study circumstances like this before making a judgement. There were a few reasons given on this board as for it being a hoax, but none of them hold any water.
*Lack of a shadow - there is a slight overcast so that shouldn't be a factor.
*The camera moves up before the UFO does - the camera is moving sporatically the whole time. It does move up just a bit before the UFO does but it's more like a shaking motion and nothing more.
*CGI hoax? - I'm not much of a computer person, but I thought CGI was for programming web pages for extra features, not for video. I could be wrong on this but, like I said "I'm not much of a computer person".
Jim
It just goes to show that the weak minded really are vulnerable to cgi hoaxes.
i think 70's hoakster billy meier would be proud!
Yeah this one must be and educated dumba$$ who "captered and saved too many smells"!
Like the other guy said, to much Star Trek.
Common people!! Why do you think its like that!? When people see things like this, their never prepared!! How could they expect to see some flying saucer of big foot!! Any IDIot can say, Ohh its a fake, without looking into it, but all too often, NO-ONE can disprove the, not even the best 21st century science or technology. And hell modern forensic science is amazing! They can caputure and save smells!! From a single hair! People have to realize things like these won't be captured over night! You can either be the average no-brainer uneducated person, who calls everything a "hoax" but yet is always hoping for further revealing footage! You ask, why are they always fuzzy ect... Its quite simple!!!!!! Unlike wildlife photographers that go out and KNOW what there looking for, these are regular ever-day people with normal everyday cameras nothing "professional" and in the short moments, how can you get ALOT of footage? Its short!? Why wouldn't it be!? Im sick of the typical no-brainer people, just think, you can't eliminate anything till you disprove that, and most like these won't be disproved because there real! Fakes are easy for pro's to see. And most prankers won't go too lengthy for pranks. Just think and use some brain power!
Jamin
This short run of tape plus the limited resolution of the video camera itself does not lend itself to a detailed visual inspection. A specialized video processing lab might reveal more than the eye can perceive. We have only the testimony of the witness himself as to the veracity of the tape. I think this gentleman would have been wise to submit this evidence to a private lab with no monetary gain for himself and leave it to the experts to make a decision. David.
I don't think footage like this will ever prove anything to the population as a whole. We need to have the UFO captured before everyone will beieve aliens are flying around out there.
Yeah too much time on planet DUH!!!!!
The last two people just proved the other guys point.TOO MUCH STAR TREK WATCHING AND NOT ENOUGH TIME SPENT HERE ON PLANET REALITY.
Yes, I think it's evident that this guy was simply having trouble with the controls of the camera. I totally agree that he was unprepared for what he was seeing. I don't think I would have responded any differently.
Is it real? We may not ever know for sure but it is a good substance for evaluation by experts.
I disagree! This video could be real. I don't think it looks fake by any means! It looks like someone who wasn't ready for what they were about to record. I don't think I would have been ready for that either.
The last person to post here has a good point.
Look people! You can all stop wondering wether its real or not . Remember the phrase "If it looks too good to be true, it probably is."?
COMON I think weve seen enough star trek movies and shows to know the difference between real and fake! I think any one who believes this s%#t is as dumb as the guy who tried to pass this off as real!
I simply do not know if this is real or not. Footage like this can be easily manipulated but there doesn't appear to be any edges around the UFO to suggest it was super-imposed. Who knows?
Yeah, 2 cents short of a dollar!
I think Shane B should start taking his medication again because if he can't distinguish between fantasy and reality, thats a big clue he's off his meds.
*************************************************
For those who are having trouble seeing the footage, this footage takes quite a while to load. The file is very large. We will try to compress the footage so it will load faster.
Thank you for your patience and understanding,
MR Admin
*************************************************
The footage would not play for me. It's a shame coz I really wanted to see it. Even without seeing it, I can say that if it was me sending in the footage, I wouldn't give my name either. There is a lot of ridicule that goes to those who say they've seen UFO's.
I couldn't see the footage. Why?
If the person Shane referred to is so concerned with "why the filmer doesn't leave his/her name", why in the hell doesn't he/she leave theirs? That's my big question! It's because he/she doesn't want to be involved in such a sensative topic.
That's my 2 cents and I stand by it!
Frank West
I do not agree with the previous comment. That person obviously will not ever take evidense like this seriously no matter how true it is. I think this looks very real and would accomodate a realistic "human" reaction to someone filming an event like this. This must have been an incredible event for this person and I will not question the camera movement at all. I would not step forward if I were the photographer either, knowing that there is no shortage of people like the person who left the previous comment.
My 2˘
Shane B.
I still think its a Bull@*&#^% fake. The person who obviously fabricated this hoax will not reveal himself because he is a coward. Plain and simple.
It's a Fake. Notice that his camera starts to pan up before the "saucer" moves up and out of view. It was in aticipation of the movement, although the timing was off for the motion of the craft. It wasn't very far above his head during the flyby, and that gives you a real perspective on the size of the craft. It looks to be about 12" across. Nice Try, but no cigar!
This is pretty cool footage. I think it looks real and is credible. I am a little skepticle about it for the reason that the person who claims to have filmed this will not reveal his name.
What are the odds that this "saucer" would zoom directly over the head of the observer? It's a fake, pure and simple.
If you want to know the truth about aliens.
sorry left that part out read next paragraph
Aaron Vannatta
chambersburg, pa
Im back i have one more thing. No matter what happens people still won't believe even if an alien being would stand 6 feet in front of us we'll still think its all a hoax. my point is no matter how much evidence there is millions of sightings photos pictures or even metals. We will all be non believers. If you know the truth about aliens click on www.artbell.com then click the (library) link then click on roswell crash and take the time to read those (3 letters).
I don't think its a hoax the way the saucer moved and size of the saucer is aproximately 15-17ft wide its probably one of those probe ships. if you notice there's a little shadow in the video but you'll have to take close look at it.
Aaron Vannatta
chambersburg, pa
This is a bull@#$% cgi fake and whomevery submitted it should be ashamed of themselves!
This isn't a model. It looks like it has mass and the way it changes direction and speeds up is not a manuever a remote controlled model could perform. I don't think this footage can ever be proven to be "the real deal" but I don't think it is a fake.
I don't see any propellers and the bottom appears to be solid. I don't think this is a model of any sort but I also gan't give an explanation of my own.
The object is probably a remote control model helicopter of the disk variety with a new home made body.
I have two theories, my first one, dispite a the adamant shadow theoy, if you look closely under where the object is the shadows of the trees would prevent any and all shadows of the object. I think that is why you do not see a shadow from this object. My second theory is that one reason to stop halfway above your head is so you do not see the person standing behind you with the radio controls. I also want to say that I am a believer in the UFO phenomenon. I have seen my share in my short life so far dating back to when I was 6 years old up until last year when I took some unusual footage of some strange object that was flying over our house one night. I do not know if it was an airplane or what it was but it was in the holding patern that the planes fly over our house with but with no noise. You are the first people out side of my immediate family that I have told about this. I love your website please keep up the good work.
avid veiwer
***********************************************
Film-Maker claims: "I did try to follow the UFO with my camera but it was gone before further footage could be taken."
Mysterious Reality Admin
***********************************************
Shadow, or no shadow, this is not a compelling piece of evidence.
I can't get a download!
"Click here" to see footage has no destination.
Something is definitely amiss aboout the UFO in relation to the scenery at the start of the clip and its not just shadows. I believe it is some kind of new CGI superimposition. Is this the total footage? It seems very much staged.
Lets not forget about the fact that this "would be" camereaman might not have been prepared for what he was about to record. I do not think any ridicule over the fact that "he did not follow the UFO as it sped off" has any merit. He was probably shocked at what he was filming and it looks as if he was having trouble getting into position in time to film the sighting at all. I'm not ready to say "this is real" but I'm not ready to rule it out as a fake either.
It seem's an attempt to zoom in on the object was
made after it began to move overhead. Why not zoom
in while the object was stationary? If I had this
chance of a lifetime to film a real UFO, I would
have certainly followed it's trail. Although it is
very good typical footage, It still does not warrant "smoking gun" status.
I agree! There does appear to be somewhat of a slight shadow while the UFO is hovering but it diminishes as it flies away.
Also, most of us do not realize the "state of shock" a person would be in when encountering such an event so the fact that the camera-man didn't follow the UFO is not shocking news to me. I have often wondered how I would react to such an event and I can not say I would respond any differently.
Referring to the previous comment about the camera moving up before the UFO did: I don't see that! It looks like the camera is shaking a bit to me. I don't see any upward motion other than a shaking camera. I do also agree with the other comment that states "it looks like there is an overcast" and a shadow might not be visible. Even the publishers of this site are suspicious of that and I don't see where that is a factor.
glad you were able to take the vidio I have seen lights moving in the skys so fast and in a irregular way ever since i could remember
Everyone is so concerned with the shadow, or lack of, as it were, well it looks like an overcast day and well maybe there would be no visible shadow without something (ie sunshine) to cause it..... And the comment about the perspective being off from the background, I can see that a bit, it does look off in comparison to the trees. Hard to say, it could be a legitimate sighting. I would also love to know why he (presuming its a he) didn't keep filming?? Love your website!!! Laura (Stinger's Cis)
dont see any wires, motion seems plausible, really good, like to see analysis by lab/expert---love the move off into the sky,,,,zzk
it's a fake, the camera operator started to move the camera up BEFORE the ufo moved up.
I don't believe this UFO footage is real, because I can't see a shadow as the "UFO" hovered between the trees or when it came towards the video camera.
Before reading the earlier comment, I was already thinking to myself, "Where's the shadow?" Additonally, during the entire clip something seems "off" about the perspective of the UFO in relation to the scenery.
If I was taking the video, when it zoomed overhead and behind me I would naturally follow it with the camera's. And as he said he brought his video camera to take footage of game I will guess that he had plenty of tape in the camera.
So why not follow it after it shot overhead.
Also there is no shadow.
|
